C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı Ile ilgili detaylı notlar

C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı Ile ilgili detaylı notlar

Blog Article

But yeah, I would have to agree that there's definitely a "hole" in the BCL where a read-only indexed collection interface should go. IList is just too multi-purpose.

Define your own class which implements IEnumerator, takes an IList in the new constructor, saf a read only default item property taking an index, and does derece include any properties/methods that could otherwise allow your list to me manipulated.

GitHub'da bizimle ortaklık gestaltn Bu dâhilğin kaynağı GitHub'da bulunabilir; burada ayrıca problemlerı ve çekme isteklerini oluşturup gözden geçirebilirsiniz. Daha bir küme vukuf muhtevain yardımda mevcut kılavuzumuzu inceleyin.

Sum(IEnumerable, Func) Computes the sum of the sequence of Single values that are obtained by invoking a transform function on each element of the input sequence.

Sum(IEnumerable, Func) Computes the sum of the sequence of Double values that are obtained by invoking a transform function on each element of the input sequence.

Your implementation depends on your needs: - If you don't care about the caller (Class B) from seeing any further changes to the collection then you gönül just clone the collection, hand it out, and stop caring. - If you definitely need the caller (Class B) to see changes that are made to the collection, and you want this C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir to be thread-safe, then you have more of a sorun on your hands.

1. The reason for not choosing ReadOnlyCollectionBase is simple - it isn't generic, while the aim of ReadOnlyCollection is to be generic. Thus it needs a much different inheritance tree.

It depends on how much you trust the calling code. If you're in complete control over everything that C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı will ever call this member and you guarantee

C# Queue derslikı yararlanmaı olabildiğince basittir ve çeşitli adımları dâhilerir. Bu adımları sahih bir şekilde izlem ederek, Queue sınıfını verimli bir şekilde kullanabilirsiniz. İşte temel adımlar ve detayları:

If you do this then there's C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri nothing stopping your callers casting the IEnumerable back to ICollection and then modifying it. ReadOnlyCollection removes this possibility, although it's still possible to access the underlying C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor writable collection via reflection.

ElementAtOrDefault(IEnumerable, Int32) Returns the element at a specified index in a sequence or a default value if the index is out of range.

1 Gotta agree with DarkWanderer here. Collections should be just that: collections. There are many other ways to centralize business logic without breaking the single C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır responsibility principle. Plus, making your collection more "clever" may actually confuse the using developer more than it helps him.

The following code example demonstrates several members of the ReadOnlyCollection class. The code example creates a List of strings and adds four dinosaur names to it. The code example then wraps the list in a ReadOnlyCollection.

Is Légal’s reported “psychological trick” considered fair play or unacceptable conduct under FIDE rules?